NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : Applin v. The Nominal Defendant [2004] NSWCA 217 HEARING DATE(S) : 25 June 2004 JUDGMENT DATE : 2 July 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Hodgson JA at 1; Tobias JA at 33; Cripps AJA at 34 DECISION : 1. Appeal allowed with costs. 2. Judgment below set aside. 3. In lieu thereof, judgment for the appellant in the sum of $230,637.64, and the respondent to pay the appellant's costs of the proceedings.
CATCHWORDS : TORT - Negligence - Motor accidents - Unregistered vehicle - Claim against Nominal Defendant - Whether farm motor cycle capable of being registered, by reason of eligibility for issue of unregistered vehicles permit - Whether necessary that the use immediately before the accident be rendered lawful by such a permit. Road Transport (Vehicle Registration) Act 1997, ss.4, 8, 18 LEGISLATION CITED : Road Transport (Vehicle Registration) Regulation 1998, cl.44 Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999, ss.3, 10, 33, 39. PARTIES : Richard Charles Applin - appellant The Nominal Defendant - respondent FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40776/03 COUNSEL : Mr. J. Maconachie QC with Mr. P. Sternberg for appellant Mr. R. Bartlett SC for respondent SOLICITORS : Pike & Associates, Bathurst for appellant Hunt & Hunt, Newcastle for respondent
LOWER COURT District Court JURISDICTION : LOWER COURT 1/02 (Bathurst) FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Sorby DCJ JUDICIAL OFFICER :
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL CA 40776/03 DC 1/02
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate