NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Koutsourais & Anor v Mary Metledge [2003] NSWSC 224 HEARING DATE(S) : 12 March 2003 JUDGMENT DATE : 28 March 2003 JURISDICTION: Common Law Division JUDGMENT OF : Master Malpass DECISION : The Summons is dismissed. The plaintiffs are to pay the costs of the Summons. The Exhibits may be returned.
CATCHWORDS : Proceedings founded on compromise agreement - availability of statutory defence - character of claim - waiver. LEGISLATION CITED : Legal Profession Act 1987, Pt 11 s 174, s 192. Conder v Silkbard [1999] NSWCA 459. Connolly Suthers (a firm) v Frost [1995] 2 Qd R 117. CASES CITED : Dodd v Gillis (1989) 16 NSWLR 623. Joseph Evans & Co Ltd v Heathcote [1918] 1 KB 418. Scadding v Eyles [1846] 9 QB 858. Udovenko v Mitchell (1997) 160 ALR 161. Manuel Koutsourais (First Plaintiff) PARTIES : Bambakit Pty Limited (Second Plaintiff) v Mary Metledge T/as Metledge & Associates (Defendant) FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 12925 of 2002
COUNSEL : Mr C A Vindin (Plaintiffs) Mr A Blank (Defendant) SOLICITORS : Tzovaras Legal (Plaintiffs) M R Barber & Associates (Defendant)
LOWER COURT Local Court JURISDICTION : LOWER COURT 1093 of 1998 Burwood Local Court FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT W G Pierce LCM JUDICIAL OFFICER :
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION
Master Malpass
Friday 28 March 2003
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate