R v Bolus and Others [2003] NSWSC 661

New South Wales Supreme Court

CITATION : R v Bolus and Others [2003] NSWSC 661 revised - 19/08/2004 HEARING DATE(S) : 04/02/03 - 10/07/03 JUDGMENT DATE : 29 May 2003

JUDGMENT OF : Howie J at 1 DECISION : Directions to be given to the jury as to the consequence of certain findings of fact.

CATCHWORDS : Criminal Law and Procedure - Jurisdiction, Practice and Procedure - Judge's Summing Up - Directions as to the consequence of certain findings by the jury. R v Bengert (No. 5) (1980) 53 CCC (2d) 481 R v Greenfield [1973] 1 WLR 1151 Saffron v The Queen (1988) 17 NSWLR 395 CASES CITED : Caratti v The Queen (2000) 22 WAR 527 R v El Azzi [2000] NSWCCA 397 Nock v DPP [1978] AC 979 Regina v Griffiths [1966] 1 QB 589 PARTIES : Regina v James Herbert Bolus, Regina v Dominic Darrington Brokenshire, Regina v Bruce Cornwell, Regina v David Paul Dicecco, Regina v Juan Guillermo Diez-Orozco, Regina v Vincent Francis, Regina v John Lawrence, Regina v Daniel Patrick McDougall, Regina v David George Norris FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 70061/02, 70066/02,70223/02, 70219/02, 70221/02, 70225/02, 70220/02, 70224/02, 70222/02 P. Roberts with I. Bourke - Crown S. Kluss - Accused Bolus G. Whitehead - Accused Brokenshire P. Boulten with P. Williams - Accused Cornwell COUNSEL : P. Hogan - Accused Dicecco P. Young - Accused Diez-Orozco R. Cooley - Accused Francis C. Waterstreet - Accused Lawrence B. Rigg - Accused McDougall C. Loukas - Accused Norris Commonwealth DPP - Crown Graham W. Howe & Co., Solicitors - Accused Bolus King's Lawyers - Accused Brokenshire Paul Hardin, Solicitor - Accused Cornwell SOLICITORS : Peter Ash, Solicitor - Accused Dicecco Neil J. O'Connor & Assoc., Solicitors - Accused Diez-Orozco Morgan Ardina Solicitors - Accused Francis Kings Lawyers - Accused Lawrence Barry Watterson, Solicitor - Accused McDougall Rigelsford Jenson & Co., Solicitors - Accused Norris