NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : (2005) Aust Contract Reports 90-207 (2004) NSW ConvR 56-088
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Cermak v Ruth Consolidated Industries [2004] NSWSC 38 HEARING DATE(S) : 17 April 2003, 15 December 2003 JUDGMENT DATE : 12 February 2004 JURISDICTION: Equity JUDGMENT OF : Master Macready at 1 DECISION : See paragraph 38
CATCHWORDS : Contract law - Rectification - Alleged unilateral mistake as to whether rent was inclusive of GST - Dispute over leased area - Rectification refused - Order for damages for breach of convenant for quiet enjoyment Air New Zealand Ltd & Enzedair Tours v Leibler, Leibant Investments Pty Ltd & Ninth Astjet Pty Ltd (VSC, 19 November 1996, Unreported) Australasian Performing Right Association Ltd v Austarama Television Pty Ltd [1972] 2 NSWLR 467 Easyfind NSW Pty Limited v Patterson (1987) 11 NSWLR 98 CASES CITED : Hooker Town Developments Pty Limited v The Director of War Service Homes (1973) 47 ALJR 320 Kelly v Ollis [2003] NSWSC 1032 Misiaris v Saydels Pty Limited [1989] ANZ ConvR 403; (1989) NSW ConvR 55-474 Taylor v Johnson (1983) 151 CLR 422 Thomas Bates & Son Limited v Wyndham's (Lingerie) Limited [1981] 1 WLR 505 Karel Vaclav Cermak - First plaintiff PARTIES : Marie Cermak - Second plaintiff Ruth Consolidated Industries - First defendant Brett Saunders Ruth - Second defendant FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 2796/01 COUNSEL : M Lawson - Plaintiffs G Sirtes - Defendants SOLICITORS : Hunter Lawyers - Plaintiffs Barringtons Lawyers - Defendants
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate