NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : VESCIO v. WESTPAC BANKING CORPORATION [2003] NSWSC 1270 revised - 22/03/2004 HEARING DATE(S) : 25-26/03/2003 JUDGMENT DATE : 26 March 2003 JURISDICTION: EQUITY JUDGMENT OF : Bryson J at 1 DECISION : Separate question answered "yes"
CATCHWORDS : MORTGAGES - mortgagee's remedies - notice before exercising power of sale Real Property Act 1900 s.57(2)(b) - finding of fact that notice delivered - consideration of requirements of Conveyancing Act 1919 s.170 - separate question answered "yes", notice given. Real Property Act 1900 LEGISLATION CITED : Conveyancing Act 1919 Law of Property Act 1925 Interpretation Act 1987 Connor v Blacktown District Hospital (1971) 1 NSWLR 713 Holwell Securities Ltd v Hughes (1973) 1 WLR 757 Bressan v Squires (1974) 2 NSWLR 460 CASES CITED : Levitt v Illawarra Seafood Pty Ltd (No 2)(1983)3 BPR 97165 at 9140 Lolly Pops (Harbourside) Pty Ltd v Werncog Pty Ltd (1998) 9 BPR 97719 at 16370 to 16372 Walville Pty Ltd v Liristis Holdings Pty Ltd 2001 NSWSC 894 In Re 88 Berkley Road [1971] 1 Ch 648 PARTIES : Paul Michael Vescio - Plaintiff Westpac Banking Corporation - Defendant FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 4525/2000 COUNSEL : T. Lee - Plaintiff P. Dowdy - Defendant SOLICITORS : Terence Lockyer Lee & Associates - Plaintiff Henry Davis York - Defendant
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES EQUITY DIVISION
BRYSON J.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate