NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 49 ACSR 531
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Otis Elevator Co Pty Ltd v. Guide Rails Pty Ltd (in liq) & Ors [2004] NSWSC 383 HEARING DATE(S) : 6 February, 2004 JUDGMENT DATE : 7 May 2004 JURISDICTION: Equity Division JUDGMENT OF : Palmer J DECISION : Declarations in accordance with reasons for judgment.
CATCHWORDS : CORPORATIONS - LIQUIDATION - DISTRIBUTION OF ASSETS - RULE IN CHERRY V BOULTBEE - WP (a corporation) owed a substantial debt to GR (a corporation) - WP was also a shareholder of GR - WP went into liquidation - subsequently GR went into liquidation with a surplus of assets available for distribution to shareholders - whether liquidator of GR could apply rule in Cherry v Boultbee against liquidators of WP - principles discussed. - ELECTION - whether liquidator of GR lost right to apply rule in Cherry v Boultbee by lodging proof of debt in liquidation of WP - principles discussed. LEGISLATION CITED : - Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) - s.176, s.439A, s.479(3), s.488(2), s.513A, s.513C - Corporations Law - s.436A(1), s.439A(4), s.461 - Borda v Burgess [2003] NSWSC 1171 - Cherry v Boultbee: 4 Myl & Cr 442; (1839) 41 ER 171 - Fenton (No 2), Re; ex parte Fenton Textile Association [1932] 1 Ch 178 - Glowbind Pty Ltd (In Liq), Re; Takchi v Parbery (2003) 48 ACSR 456 - Hodgson (dec'd), Re; Hodgson v Fox (1878) 9 Ch D 673 - Jeffs v Wood (1723) 2 P Wms 28 [24 ER 668] CASES CITED : - G.B. Nathan & Co Pty Ltd (in liq), Re (1991) 24 NSWLR 674 - Orpen, Re (1880) 16 Ch D 202 - Peruvian Railway Construction Company Ltd, Re [1915] 2 Ch 144 - Sargent v ASL Developments Limited (1974) 131 CLR 634 - Sewell, In re; White v Sewell [1909] 1 Ch 806 - Stammers v Elliott (1868) LR 3 Ch App 195 - Wood "English and International Set-off" (1989) para.8-131 Guide Rails Pty Ltd (in liq) - Applicant (First Defendant/Second Cross Defendant) Wood Parsons Pty Ltd - First Respondent (Third Cross Defendant) PARTIES : Otis Elevator Co Pty Ltd - Second Respondent (Plaintiff/First Cross Defendant) East Coast Rail Systems - Second Defendant/First Cross Claimant Colorado Elevators Inc - Third Defendant/Second Cross Claimant FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 4383/00 R.K. Eassie - Applicant COUNSEL : B.J. Coles QC and D. Kell - First Respondent M. Addison (Sol) - Second Respondent (Excused) Coudert Bros - Applicant SOLICITORS : Baker & McKenzie - First Respondent Dibbs Barker Gosling - Second Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate