NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : REGINA v. KELLY [2003] NSWCCA 317 HEARING DATE(S) : Wednesday 3 September 2003 JUDGMENT DATE : 5 November 2003
JUDGMENT OF : Greg James J at 1; Howie J at 49; Smart AJ at 50 DECISION : Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed
CATCHWORDS : Criminal law - appeal - sentence - armed robbery - aggravation - asserted duress - psychiatric problems - credibility - prospects of rehabilitation - onerous circumstances of confinement - sentence asserted to be manifestly excessive - application of guideline in Henry - asserted failure to apply decisions referring to mental illness - sentence appropriate. LEGISLATION CITED : Crimes Act 1900 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Henry & Ors (1999) 46 NSWLR 346 Letteri (NSWCCA, unreported 18 March 1992) CASES CITED : Israil [2002] NSWCCA 255 Nelson [2002] NSWCCA 463 Thomson & Houlton (2000) 49 NSWLR 383 PARTIES : REGINA v. KELLY, Leonard Shaun FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA No. 60194/03 COUNSEL : Crown: M. Grogan App: A. Francis SOLICITORS : Crown: S.E. O'Connor App: D.J. Humphreys
LOWER COURT District Court JURISDICTION : LOWER COURT 02/51/0010 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Ducker, DCJ. JUDICIAL OFFICER :
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 60194 of 2003
GREG JAMES, J. HOWIE, J. SMART, AJ.
WEDNESDAY 5 NOVEMBER 2003 REGINA v. LEONARD SHAUN KELLY Judgment
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate