NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : 21 Million Pty Limited v Clarence Street Pty Limited [2003] NSWSC 1160 HEARING DATE(S) : 3/12/03, 4/12/03 JUDGMENT DATE : 4 December 2003 JURISDICTION: Equity Division JUDGMENT OF : Einstein J DECISION : Order that caveat by cross defendant be withdrawn.
CATCHWORDS : Real Property - Caveats - Equity - Interlocutory Injunction - Principles Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW) Jurisdiction of Courts (Cross-Vesting) Act 1987 (Cth) LEGISLATION CITED : Real Property Act 1900 (NSW) Stamp Duties Act 1920 (NSW) Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW) American Cyanamid Co v Ethicon Ltd [1975] AC 396 Appleton Papers Inc v Tomasetti Paper Pty Limited [1983] 3 NSWLR 208 Australian Apple and Pear Marketing Board v Tonking (1942) 66 CLR 77 Beecham Group Limited v Bristol Laboratories Pty Limited (1968) 118 CLR 618 Deangrove Pty Ltd v Commonwealth Bank (2001) 37 ACSR 465 Eng Mee Yong v Letchumanan [1980] AC 331 Geneva Finance Ltd Re (1992) 7 ACSR 415 Hawkesbury Development Co Ltd v Landmark Finance Pty Ltd (1969) 92 WN (NSW) 199 Magna Alloys & Research Pty Ltd v Coffey [1981] VR 23 CASES CITED : Miller v Jackson [1977] QB 966 M Wheeler & Co v Warren [1928] Ch 840 Newhart Developments Ltd v Cooperative Commercial Bank Ltd [1978] QB 814 Patrick Stevedores Operations No 2 Pty Ltd v Maritime Union of Australia (1998) 195 CLR 1 Penny Nominees Pty Ltd v Fountain (Unreported, Supreme Court of New South Wales, 2 May 1989, Young J) Plimpton v Spiller (1876) 4 Ch D 286 Pollnow Garden Mews - St Leonards Pty Ltd (1984) 9 ACLR 82 Scottish Properties Pty Ltd Re (1977) 2 ACLR 264 Shercliff v Engadine Acceptance Corporation Pty Ltd [1978] 1 NSWLR 729 Stollznow v Calvert [1980] 2 NSWLR 749 Woodward v Page (1989) 7 BPR 14,612 21 Million Pty Limited (Plaintiff) PARTIES : FBN Investments Pty Limited (Receivers & Managers) (Cross-Defendant) Clarence Street Pty Limited (Defendant and Cross-Claimant) FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 5885/03 Mr RD Wilson (Plaintiff) COUNSEL : Mr J Stoljar (Cross-Defendant) Mr AJL Bannon SC, Mr GKJ Rich (Defendant and Cross-Claimant) Tress Cocks & Maddox (Plaintiff) SOLICITORS : Argyle Partnership (Cross-Defendant) Watson Mangioni (Defendant and Cross-Claimant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate