NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Mealey v Mountains Development Group Pty Ltd [2003] NSWSC 830 HEARING DATE(S) : 9 September 2003 JUDGMENT DATE : 15 September 2003
JUDGMENT OF : Gzell J DECISION : Amendment refused. Declaration on cross claim that notices ineffective. Plaintiff to pay defendant's costs
CATCHWORDS : CONTRACTS - General Contractual Principles - Discharge, Breach and Defences to Action for Breach - Standard provision that vendor could terminate contract for sale of land for breach in an essential respect - Standard provision that, subject to other provisions, time was fixed but not essential - Whether special provision for lodgement of a development application by a fixed time was essential - Whether special provision to keep vendor fully informed was essential - Whether special provision to act with due diligence and use best endeavours was essential - Whether notice of termination for such alleged breaches was effective - PROCEDURE - Miscellaneous procedural matters - Whether amendment should be allowed after evidence and addresses to add a claim that notice terminated for repudiation as distinct from termination for breach of an essential promise LEGISLATION CITED : Local Government Act 1993 Wickman Machine Tool Sales Ltd v L Schuler AG [1972] 1 WLR 840 L Shuler AG v Wickman Machine Tool Sales Ltd [1974] AC 235 Tramways Advertising Pty Ltd v Luna Park (NSW) Ltd (1938) 38 SR (NSW) 632 Associated Newspapers Ltd v Bancks (1951) 83 CLR 322 DTR Nominees Pty Ltd v Mona Homes Pty Ltd (1977-1978) 138 CLR 423 Cehave NV v Bremer Handelsgesellschaft mbH [1976] QB 44 Ankar Pty Ltd v National Westminster Finance (Australia) Ltd (1986-1987) 162 CLR 549 TriContinental Corporation Ltd v HDFI Ltd (1990) 21 NSWLR 689 Suttor v Gundowda Pty Ltd (1950) 81 CLR 418 Perri v Coolangatta Investments Pty Ltd (1982) 149 CLR 537 Hong Kong Fir Shipping Co Ltd v Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd [1962] 2 QB 26 Lohar Corporation Pty Ltd v Dibu Pty Ltd (1976) 1 BPR 9177 Dainford Ltd v Yulora Pty Ltd [1984] 1 NSWLR 546 CASES CITED : Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298 Bysouth v Shire of Blackburn & Mitcham (No 2) [1928] VLR 562 Legione v Hateley (1983) 152 CLR 406 Ciavarella v Balmer (1983) 153 CLR 438 Stern v McArthur (1988) 165 CLR 489 Pentagold Investments Pty Ltd v Romanos [2002] ANZ ConvR 132 Sanctuary Investments Pty Ltd v St Gregory's Armenian School Inc (unreported, SC(NSW), 18 December 1998) Lennox v Cameron (1997) 8 BPR 15,939 Immer (No 145) Pty Ltd v Uniting Church in Australia Property Trust (NSW) (1992-1993) 182 CLR 26 Gordon v MacGregor (1909) 8 CLR 316 Leotta v Public Transport Commission (NSW) (1976) 50 ALJR 666 Queensland v J L Holdings Pty Ltd (1996-1997) 189 CLR 146 Water Board v Moustakas (1988) 180 CLR 491 Commissioner of Taxation v Brambles Holdings Ltd (1991) 28 FCR 451 Meagher Gummow and Lehane, Equity Doctrines and Remedies, 4th ed, Butterworths Lexis Nexis, Australia 2002 PARTIES : Christopher John Mealey - Plaintiff Mountains Development Group Pty Ltd - Defendant FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 3166/03 COUNSEL : Mr D I Cassidy QC with Mr D M Flaherty - Plaintiff Mr B C Oslington QC with Mr M A Jones - Defendant SOLICITORS : Jack Rigg - Plaintiff Lamrocks Solicitors - Defendant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate