NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : ASIC v Orehek & Ors [2003] NSWSC 1067 HEARING DATE(S) : 14 November 2003 JUDGMENT DATE : 14 November 2003 JURISDICTION: Equity JUDGMENT OF : Campbell J DECISION : Liquidator and Administrator of other companies appointed as Liquidator of subject companies, upon receipt of an undertaking to resign or seek advice of the Court whether he should resign if he perceives a conflict. Winding up orders made in several proceedings.
CATCHWORDS : CORPORATIONS - winding up - subject companies possibly have affairs intermingled with affairs of other companies already in liquidation or under administration - whether liquidator and administrator of those other companies should be appointed as liquidator of subject companies - CORPORATIONS - winding up - several applications concerning winding up - payment of costs of parties to the various application LEGISLATION CITED : Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) Australian Securities & Investment Commission - Plaintiff PARTIES : Robert John Orehek - First Defendant Marriott Properties Pty Ltd - Second Defendant Platinum Finance Group Pty Ltd - Third Defendant FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 5644/03 D R Stack - Plaintiff COUNSEL : M Foley, solicitor - Defendants P Day, solicitor - Liquidator of Grace Abounds P J Harkin, solicitor - Liquidator of Orehek Group SOLICITORS : Australian Securities & Investment Commission - Plaintiff Foleys - Defendants
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES EQUITY DIVISION CORPORATIONS LIST
CAMPBELL J
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate