NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : Regina v Daniella Dawes [2004] NSWCCA 363 HEARING DATE(S) : 29 September 2004 JUDGMENT DATE : 5 November 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Dunford J at 1; Barr J at 50; Hoeben J at 75 DECISION : Crown appeal dismissed
CATCHWORDS : CRIMINAL LAW - Sentencing - manslaughter - mother kills autistic son when suffering major depressive illness - s9 bond - whether inadequate - CROWN APPEAL - Court's discretion - double jeopardy - Crown's failure to seek custodial sentence at first instance - respondent's progress in rehabilitation since given bond Crimes Act 1900 LEGISLATION CITED : Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Everett v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 295 Malvaso v The Queen (1989) 168 CLR 227 R v Albury-Thompson (1998) 16 CRNZ 79 R v Allpass (1993) 72 A Crim R 561 R v Blacklidge (CCA - 12 December 1995) R v Cooper [2001] NSWSC 769 R v Ditfort (CCA - 1 March 1992) R v Duroux (CCA - unreported - 11 April 1991) R v Edwards (1996) 90 A Crim R 510 R v Hughesman (CCA - unreported - 5 April 1995) CASES CITED : R v Jermyn (1985) 2 NSWLR 194 R v Li [2000] NSWSC 1088 R v MA [2004] NSWCCA 92 R v McDonald (12 December 1995) R v Morgan (1997) 78 A Crim R 368 R v Newman [2004] NSWCCA 102 R v Palu (2002) 134 A Crim R 174 R v Previtera (1997) 94 A Crim R 76 R v Schelberger (CCA - 2 June 1988) R v Troja (CCA - unreported - 6 July 1991) R v Vaughan (1991) 56 A Crim R 355 PARTIES : Regina v Daniella Dawes FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 2004/1859 COUNSEL : L M B Lamprati SC - Crown A J Bellanto QC/ M Maxwell - Respondent SOLICITORS : S Kavanagh - Crown Patricia White & Associates - Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate