NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : Amaca Pty Ltd v Karakasch [2004] NSWCA 79 HEARING DATE(S) : 26/02/04, 27/02/04 JUDGMENT DATE : 22 March 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Santow JA at 1; Cripps AJA at 2 DECISION : Appeal dismissed with costs.
CATCHWORDS : Appeal from Dust Diseases Tribunal of NSW - Questions of law (s 32) - Adequacy of reasons LEGISLATION CITED : Dust Diseases Tribunal Act 1989 s 32 Husher v Husher (1999) 197 CLR 138 CASES CITED : Azzopardi v Tasman UEB Industries Ltd (1985) 4 NSWLR 139 State of New South Wales v Moss (54 NSWLR 536) APPELLANT Amaca Pty Ltd PARTIES : RESPONDENT Robyn Elizabeth Karakasch, Executor of the Estate of the Late Ian Victor Karakasch FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40653/03 APPELLANT Ms A J Katzmann SC with Mr R A O'Keefe COUNSEL : RESPONDENT Mr J T Gleeson SC with Mr A J Abadee APPELLANT Phillips Fox SOLICITORS : RESPONDENT Slater & Gordon
LOWER COURT Dust Diseases Tribunal of NSW JURISDICTION : LOWER COURT 516/02 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Maguire J JUDICIAL OFFICER :
- 1 - IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL CA 40653/03
SANTOW JA CRIPPS AJA Monday 22 March 2004
AMACA PTY LTD v ROBYN ELIZABETH KARAKASCH (Executor of the Estate of the Late Ian Victor Karakasch)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate