NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : R v Cook [2004] NSWCCA 52 revised - 18/03/2004 HEARING DATE(S) : 27 February 2004 JUDGMENT DATE : 12 March 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Ipp JA at 1; Simpson J at 2; Adams J at 73 DECISION : Appeal against conviction allowed, verdict of guilty set aside, new trial ordered
CATCHWORDS : appeal against conviction - leave to appeal against sentence - threatening to inflict actual bodily harm by means of an offensive weapon with intent to have sexual intercourse - admission of evidence of flight - directions regarding consciousness of guilt - lies - the proviso to s6(1) of the Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) s61K(b) LEGISLATION CITED : Criminal Appeal Act 1912 s61 Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) s137 Edwards v The Queen (1993) 178 CLR 193 R v Bridgman (1980) 24 SASR 278 R v Fowler [2000] NSWCCA 142, unreported, 23 May 2000 R v Heyde (1990) 20 NSWLR 234 R v Lucas [1981] 1 QB 720 CASES CITED : R v Melrose [1989] 1QdR 572; (1987) 30 A Crim R 332 R v Power (1996) 87 A Crim R 407 (Court of Criminal Appeal, South Australia) R V Sutton (1986) 5 NSWLR 697 R v Taranto [1999] NSWCCA 396, unreported, 16 December 1999 Wilde v The Queen (1988) 164 CLR 365 Zoneff v The Queen [2000] HCA 23; 200 CLR 234 PARTIES : Crown - Respondent Daryl Norman Stanley Cook - Appellant FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60166/03 COUNSEL : B Knox SC - Crown CB Craigie SC - Appellant SOLICITORS : S Kavanagh - Crown M Wells - Appellant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate