NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : Regina v Michael Arthur Falls [2004] NSWCCA 335 HEARING DATE(S) : 11 May 2004 JUDGMENT DATE : 1 October 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Dunford J at 1; Adams J at 8; Howie J at 28 DECISION : Leave to appeal granted - appeal upheld - applicant re-sentenced
CATCHWORDS : Criminal Law - Sentencing - detain for advantage - sexual advantage - plea of guilty - statement of agreed facts tendered by consent - applicant gives evidence at variance to agreed facts - not cross-examined thereon - judge sentences on basis of agreed facts - whether erroneous - sentence otherwise excessive LEGISLATION CITED : Crimes Act 1900 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 GAS and SJK v The Queen [2004] HCA 22 R v Barri [2004] NSWCCA 221 R v Blanchard (NSWCCA, 10 September 1991, unreported) CASES CITED : R v Harkin (1989) 38 A Crim R 296 R v Newell [2004] NSWCCA 183 R v O'Neill (1979) 2 NSWLR 582 R v Palu (2002) 134 A Crim R 174 PARTIES : Regina v Michael Arthur Falls FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60032/04 COUNSEL : B Knox SC - Crown R Burgess - Applicant SOLICITORS : S Kavanagh - Crown Legal Aid Commission - Applicant
LOWER COURT District Court JURISDICTION : LOWER COURT 02/11/1240 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Blanch CJDC JUDICIAL OFFICER :
- 22 - IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 60032/04
DUNFORD J ADAMS J HOWIE J
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate