NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Chocolate Factory Apartments Limited v Westpoint Finance Pty Limited & Ors [2003] NSWSC 547 HEARING DATE(S) : 17/06/03, 18/06/03 JUDGMENT DATE : 18 June 2003 JURISDICTION: Equity Division JUDGMENT OF : Einstein J DECISION : Leave granted to plaintiff to amend statement of claim and in one instance question of leave to abide proper furnishing of particulars.
CATCHWORDS : Practice and procedure - Part 72 Supreme Court Rules Reference - Power in referee to permit amendments or additions to pleadings - Referee disallowing application by plaintiff for leave to amend - Application to the court by plaintiff to give directions granting the leave to amend - Ongoing reference - Principles applicable on such applications to the Court - Considerations to be taken into account - interests of justice likely require it to be quite clearly demonstrated that interlocutory decision by referee clearly miscarried before referee's decision will be interfered with - Case management by referee of parameters of application for leave to amend - Overriding Purpose Rule to facilitate the just, quick and cheap resolution of the real issues in civil proceedings - Long term view of reference taken into account - Orders made permitting amendments sought LEGISLATION CITED : Corporations Act 2001 Supreme Court Rules Adam P. Brown Male Fashions Pty Ltd v Philip Morris Inc (1981) 148 CLR 170 AMP Fire and General Insurance Co Ltd v Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd [unreported, Court of Appeal, 14 July 1993] Ampolex Limited v Perpetual Trustee Company (Canberra) Ltd & Ors S100/1996 (22 May 1996) Cropper v Smith (1884) 26 ChD CASES CITED : Eydmann v Premier Accumulator Company Limited (1916) 85 LJKB 1037 Queensland v J L Holdings Pty Limited (1996) 189 CLR 146 Trevor Howse Associates Pty Limited v Dessmann (2003) NSWCA 148 U.S Surgical Corporation v Hospital Products (1983) 2 NSWLR 157 Xuereb v Viola (1989) 18 NSWLR 453 Chocolate Factory Apartments Limited (Plaintiff) PARTIES : Westpoint Finance Pty Limited (First Defendant) Westpoint Constructions Pty Limited (Second Defendant) Westpoint Management Limited (Third Defendant) FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 2583/02 COUNSEL : Mr F Corsaro SC, Mr VR Gray (Plaintiff) Mr DE Grieve QC, Mr D Hicks (Defendants) SOLICITORS : Frank G Kalyk (Plaintiff) Robinson Beale Horton McMinn (Defendants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate