NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : R v CJP [2004] NSWCCA 188 revised - 25/06/2004 HEARING DATE(S) : 26/05/2004 JUDGMENT DATE : 16 June 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Hulme J at 1; Simpson J at 2; Howie J at 3 DECISION : 1. The application for leave to appeal is refused; 2. The Crown appeal is allowed; 3. The sentences imposed in respect of counts 3, 4 and 5 are quashed; 4. In respect of charge 5 the respondent is sentenced to imprisonment for a period of 5 1/2 years with a non-parole period of 4 years both such periods to commence on 28 November 2002. The non-parole period will expire on 27 November 2006; 5. In respect of charge 4 the respondent is sentenced to imprisonment for a period of 6 years with a non-parole period of 4 1/2 years both such periods to commence on 28 November 2003. The non-parole period will expire on 27 May 2008; 6. In respect of charge 3 the responent is sentenced to imprisonment for a period of 9 years with a non-parole period of 5 1/2 years both such periods to commence on 28 November 2005. The non-parole period will expire on 27 May 2011.
CATCHWORDS : Criminal Law and Procedure - Crown appeal against sentence - child sexual assault offences - failure to cumulate some sentences - exceptionally serious offences - delay in appeal and unsatisfactory history of proceedings - insufficient to justify court not intervening. LEGISLATION CITED : Justices Act 1902 - s 51A (now repealed) Crimes Act 1900 - ss 61J, 61N(1), 66C(1) R v CJP [2003] NSWCCA 187 R v Wong and Leung [2002] NSWCCA 169 R v Henry (1999) 46 NSWLR 436 R v SY [2003] NSWCCA 291 Attorney General's Application under s 37 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 No 1 of 2002 (2002) 56 NSWLR 146 R v Gilmore (1979) 1 A Crim R 416 CASES CITED : R v MM (2002) 135 A Crim R 431 R v Wall [2002] NSWCCA 42 Johnson v The Queen (2004) 205 ALR 346 R v Hayes [2004] NSWCCA 156 R v Blanco (1999) 106 A Crim R 303 R v Way [2004] NSWCCA 131 R v Fidow [2004] NSWCCA 172 Dinsdale v The Queen (2000) 202 CLR 32 PARTIES : Regina v CJP FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60021/04 COUNSEL : D. Woodburne - Crown H. Dhanji - Respondent SOLICITORS : S. Kavanagh - Crown S. O'Connor - Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate