NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : Regina v Ayoub [2004] NSWCCA 209 revised - 06/07/2004 HEARING DATE(S) : 7/5/04 JUDGMENT DATE : 28 June 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Grove J at 1; Howie J at 2; Newman AJ at 20; DECISION : 1. Appeal upheld; 2. Conviction quashed ; 3. New trial ordered
CATCHWORDS : Criminal Law - appeal - identification - standard of proof - negative identification - rule in Browne v Dunn - judicial intervention - warning concerning potential unreliability of defence witnesses LEGISLATION CITED : Evidence Act 1995 - S165 (1) (e) Mule v The Queen [2002] WASCA 101 Pollitt v R (1990) 51 ACR 227 R v Stewart (2001) 52 NSWLR 301 CASES CITED : R v Fowler [2003] NSWCCA 321 R v Baker [2001] NSWCCA 151 R v OGD (1997) 45 NSWLR 744 R v Rose (2002) 55 NSWLR 701 PARTIES : Regina Brian Nicholas Ayoub FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60022/04 COUNSEL : Crown: D. Woodburne Ayoub: P. Hamill SOLICITORS : Crown: C.K. Smith Ayoub: S. O'Connor
LOWER COURT District Court JURISDICTION : LOWER COURT 03/51/0024 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Ducker ADCJ JUDICIAL OFFICER :
IN THE COURT OF
CRIMINAL APPEAL 60022/04
GROVE J HOWIE J NEWMAN AJ
Monday 28 June 2004 R v AYOUB Judgment 1 GROVE J: I have had the advantage of reading the judgments of Howie J and Newman AJ in draft form and I agree with their Honours and the orders which are proposed.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate