NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 59 NSWLR 678 (2004) Aust Torts Reports 81-746
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : Fatimi Pty Ltd v Bryant & 2 Ors [2004] NSWCA 140 HEARING DATE(S) : 28/10/2003 JUDGMENT DATE : 6 May 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Handley JA at 1; Giles JA at 43; McColl JA at 83 DECISION : Appeal dismissed with costs.
CATCHWORDS : CONSPIRACY - to injure by unlawful means - conspiracy must be aimed or directed at plaintiff - no need to prove dominant purpose of injuring plaintiff - purpose of protecting or advancing interests of conspirators no defence - CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY - conspiracy to defraud - dishonest means - requirement that victim have civil remedy - need for congruence with tort of conspiracy to injure by unlawful means - DAMAGES - exemplary - tort actionable only on proof of damage - exemplary damages not available where compensatory damages not proved and tort not established - D Conveyancing Act 1919, s 37A LEGISLATION CITED : Corporations Law, ss 471B, 570, 596 Crimes Act 1900, s 319 A v Bottrill (2003) 1 AC 449 Adams v The Queen [1995] 1 WLR 52 Amalgamated Television Services Pty Ltd v Marsden (No 2) (2003) 57 NSWLR 338 Brandy v Flamboyant Investment Company Ltd 772 F Supp 1538 (1991) Carey v After The Gold Rush 715 P 2d 803 (1986) Cash & Carry Cleaners Ltd v Delmas (1973) 44 DLR (3d) 315 Cassell & Co Ltd v Broome (1972) AC 1027 Coomera Resort Pty Ltd v Kolback Securities Ltd [2004] 1 Qd R 1 Cousins v Wilson (1994) 1 NZLR 463 Donsellar v Donsellar (1982) 1 NZLR 97 Guaranty Trust Co of Canada v Public Trustee (1978) 87 DLR (3d) 417 Harris v Digital Pulse Pty Ltd (2003) 56 NSWLR 298 Johnston Terminals & Storage Ltd v Miscellaneous Workers, Wholesale and Retail Delivery Drivers & Helpers Local Union (1995) 61 DLR (3d) 741 Kirkbride v Lisbon Contractors Ltd 521 Pa 97 (1989) Lonrho Ltd v Shell Petroleum Co Ltd (No 2) [1982] AC 173 Lonrho Plc v Fayed (No 5) (1993) 1 WLR 1489 CASES CITED : Lonrho Plc v Fayed [1992] 1 AC 448 Malec v J C Hutton Pty Ltd (1990) 169 CLR 638 McLaren Transport Ltd v Somerville (1996) 3 NZLR 424 McWilliam v Penthouse Publication Ltd [2001] NSWCA 237 Michaels v Taylor Woodrow Developments Ltd [2001] Ch 493 Peters v The Queen (1998) 192 CLR 493 The Queen v Warburton (1870) LR 1 CCR 274 Quinn v Leatham (1901) AC 495 R v Governor of Pentonville Prison Ex parte Tarling (1978) 70 Crim App R 77 R v Weaver (1931) 45 CLR 321 Rhoads v Heberling 306 Pa Super 35 (1982) Vorvis v Insurance Corporation of British Columbia (1989) 58 DLR (4th) 193 White v Hansen 813 813 P 2d 750 (1991) White v Moses Taylor Hospital 763 F Supp 776 (1991) Williams v Hursey (1959) 103 CLR 30 Williams v Hursey (1959) 103 CLR 30 XL Petroleum (NSW) Pty Ltd v Caltex Oil (Australia) Pty Ltd (1985) 155 CLR 448 Fatimi Pty Ltd (Appellant) PARTIES : Elizabeth Charlotte Bryant (First Respondent) Richard Michael Bryant (Second Respondent) Richard Joseph Bryant (Third Respondent) FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40942/02 COUNSEL : M Aldridge SC/M Evans (Appellant) F Kunc/M Henry (Respondents) SOLICITORS : John Cunningham (Appellant) John Sheehy (Respondents)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate