NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Krslovic Homes v Timothy Sparkes & Ors [2004] NSWSC 374 revised - 7/05/2004 HEARING DATE(S) : 21/04/04 JUDGMENT DATE : 5 May 2004 JURISDICTION: Administrative Law JUDGMENT OF : Shaw J at 1 DECISION : 1) A declaration is made that the orders made by the third defendant on 7 February 2003 are void and of no effect; 2) Each party shall pay their own costs of these proceedings; 3) Certificates of indemnity are to be granted in accordance with the Suitors' Fund Act; 4) Proceedings determined accordingly; 5) Liberty to apply is granted to all parties, on reasonable notice, if further argument is required to finalise orders in accordance with this judgment
CATCHWORDS : Former Member of the Fair Trading Tribunal - Whether adjudication was made - Appeal against decisions - Costs against the Tribunal Anti-Discrimination Act 1997 (NSW) Consumer, Trader and Tenancy Tribunal Act 2001 (NSW) , ss 3, 5, 21, 39, 40, 44, 52 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 5B Fair Trading Tribunal Act 1998 (NSW), s 6(1) LEGISLATION CITED : Home Building Act 1989 (NSW) Justices Act 1902 (NSW), s 101 Residential Tribunal Act 1998 (NSW) Suitors' Fund Act 1951 (NSW), ss 2, 6, 6A, 6B, 6C, 6(1)a Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW) ss 44, 76 Aboriginal Hotels Ltd v Fisher (SC (Vic) unreported, 27 November, 1997); Alice Springs Commercial Broadcasting Pty Limited v Australian Broadcasting Tribunal & Kim Wilson (Unreported, 14 October 1992); Anderson Stuart v Teleaven [2000] NSWSC 56; Australian Postal Commission v Dao (No 2) (1986) 6 NSWLR 497; Basapa v Burton (1991) ASC 9 56; Blume; re Osborne (1958) SR (NSW) 334; Builders' Labourers Federation v Minister for Industrial Relations (1986) 7 NSWLR 372; Builders' Licensing Board v Pride Constructions Pty Limited (1979) 1 NSWLR 607; Carr v Werry [1979] 1 NSW 144; Clyne v East (1967) SR (NSW) 385; Cummins v McKenzie [1979] 2 NSWLR 803; ex parte Hebburn Limited v Kearsley Shire Council (1947) 47 SR (NSW) 416; ex parte Neville (1996) 2 NSWLR 481; ex parte Parsons (1952) 69 WN (NSW) 380; ex parte Vincent (1990) 16 WN (NSW) 215; Full Brick Homes Pty Ltd v Consumer Claims Tribunal (unreported 13 February 1997); Kable v Director of Public Prosecutions for the State of NSW (1996) 189 CLR 51; CASES CITED : Magistrates' Court of Victoria at Heidelberg v Robinson (2000) 2 VR 233; Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Bhardwaj (2002) 209 CLR 597; MIR Bros Developments Pty Limited v Atlantic Construction Pty limited [1985] 1 NSWLR 491; Onions v GIO (NSW) (1956) 73 WN (NSW) 279; Our Town FM v Australian Broadcasting Tribunal (1987) 77 ALR 609; Portazon Pty Limited t/as Bordignon Engineering Co v Fair Trading Tribunal [1999] NSWSC 1084; Quidwai v Brown [1984] 1 NSWLR 100; R v Australian Broadcasting Tribunal; ex parte Hardiman (1980) 144 CLR 13; R v Cooke [1997] 1 Qd R 616; R v Kirby; ex parte Boilermakers' Society of Australia (1956) 94 CLR 254; Re Freehill Hollingdale and Page's Bill of Costs [1998] 1 Qd R 616; Reid v Sydney City Council (1995) 35 NSWLR 719; Sankey v Whitlam [1997] 1 NSWLR 333; The South East Queensland Electricity Board v Australian Telecommunications Commission 94 CLR 254; Trade Practices Tribunal ; ex parte Tasmanian Breweries Pty Limited (1970) 123 CLR 374; Turnett v Macquarie Stevedoring Company Pty Limited (No 2) (1956) 95 CLR 106; Walker v Law Society of Tasmania (SC (Tas) unreported, 13 December, 1991); Wentworth v Wentworth (1999) 46 NSWLR 300 Krslovic Homes Pty Ltd (Plaintiff) PARTIES : Timothy Nigel Sparkes (First Defendant) Sarah Elisabeth Sparkes (Second Defendant) Consumer Trader & Tenancy Tribunal (Third Defendant) FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 30035/2003 Mr Bellamy (Plaintiff) COUNSEL : Mr R Harper (First & Second Defendant) A. Johnson (sol) (Third Defendant) Dibbs Barker Gosling (Plaintiff) SOLICITORS : Stephen Miller (First & Second Defendants) Crown Solicitor's Office (Third Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate