NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : Regina v Lagi [2004] NSWCCA 443 HEARING DATE(S) : 03/12/04 JUDGMENT DATE : 8 December 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Mason P at 1; Barr J at 2; Hoeben J at 3 DECISION : Appeal against conviction dismissed.; Leave to appeal against severity of sentence granted, but appeal dismissed.
CATCHWORDS : CRIMINAL LAW: - conviction appeal - use an offensive weapon in company with intent to prevent lawful apprehension - whether available on evidence - inconsistent verdicts - sentence appeal - whether parity principle observed. LEGISLATION CITED : Crimes Act 1900 Firearms Act 1996 CASES CITED : Mackenzie v The Queen (1996) 190 CLR 348 R v Thompson & Houlton (2000) 40 NSWLR 383 PARTIES : Crown - Respondent Meli Lagi - Appellant FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 2004/1740 COUNSEL : R Toner SC - Appellant D Howard SC - Crown SOLICITORS : S Macedone - Appellant S Kavanagh, Solicitor for Public Prosecutions - Crown
LOWER COURT Supreme Court JURISDICTION : LOWER COURT 70234/02 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Wood CJ at CL JUDICIAL OFFICER :
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 2004/1740
MASON P BARR J HOEBEN J
Wednesday, 8 December, 2004 REGINA v Meli LAGI Judgment 1 MASON P: I agree with Hoeben J. 2 BARR J: I agree with Hoeben J. 3 HOEBEN J: Offences and conviction appeal The appellant and John Taufahema on 20 August 2003 were each indicted before his Honour Justice Wood, Chief Judge at Common Law, and a jury in the Supreme Court of New South Wales on the following counts.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate