NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Ayteniz v NRMA Insurance [2003] NSWSC 406 HEARING DATE(S) : 12 May 2003 JUDGMENT DATE : 19 May 2003 JURISDICTION: Common Law JUDGMENT OF : Master Harrison DECISION : (1) The appeal is dismissed; (2) The verdict in favour of the defendant is confirmed; (3) The amended summons is dismissed; (4) The plaintiff is to pay the defendant's costs as agreed or assessed.
CATCHWORDS : Appeal decision of Local Court Magistrate - insurance - wilful misconduct LEGISLATION CITED : Local Court (Civil Claims) Act 1970 (NSW) - 69 Allen v Kerr & Anor (1995) Aust Torts Reports 81-354 Azzopardi v Tasman UEB Industries Ltd (1985) 4 NSWLR 139 Craig v Associated National Insurance Co Ltd (1983) 71 FLR 455 CASES CITED : Carr v Neil [1999] NSWSC 1263 Devries v Australian National Railways Commission (1993) 177 CLR 472 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499 Pace v Read [2000] NSWSC 823 State Rail Authority of New South Wales v Earthline Constructions Pty Ltd (in Liq) (1999) 160 ALR 588 Erdal Ayteniz (Plaintiff) PARTIES : NRMA Insurance Limited (Defendant) FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 11861/2002 Mr E Gramelis (Plaintiff) COUNSEL : Mr P Mahony (Defendant) Stojanovic Solicitors (Plaintiff) SOLICITORS : Ms A Heydon Abbott Tout (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate