NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Brown v Sydney Eye Hospital & Anor [2004] NSWSC 1112 HEARING DATE(S) : 3 September 2004 JUDGMENT DATE : 22 November 2004 JURISDICTION: Common Law - Professional Negligence List JUDGMENT OF : Master Harrison DECISION : (1) The first defendant is to answer interrogatories 5, 6, 7, 10, 12 and 15 as amended within 21 days; (2) The second defendant is to answer interrogatories 1, 16, 17, 26 and 27 within 21 days; (3) The balance of the notice of motion is dismissed; (4) Costs of the motion are costs in the cause.
CATCHWORDS : Interrogatories LEGISLATION CITED : Supreme Court Rules 1970 (NSW) Part 24 rr 5 & 6 CASES CITED : American Flange & Manufacturing Co Inc v Rheem (Australia) Pty Limited (No 2) [1965] NSWR 193 Yamazak v Mustaca & Ors [1999] NSWSC 864 Patrica Brown (Plaintiff)
PARTIES : South Eastern Sydney Area Health Service t/as Sydney Eye Hospital (First Defendant)
Dr Woodey (Second Defendant) FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 20179/2003 Mr R Ingram (Plaintiff)
COUNSEL : Mr G Gemmell (First Defendant)
Mr S Kalfas (Second Defendant) Taylor & Scott (Plaintiff)
SOLICITORS : Frances Allpress (First Defendant)
TressCox (Second Defendant)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION PROFESSIONAL NEGLIGENCE LIST
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate