NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : R v Jones [2004] NSWCCA 432 HEARING DATE(S) : 1 December 2004 JUDGMENT DATE : 10 December 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Tobias JA at 1; Sully J at 48; Hoeben J at 49 DECISION : (1) Leave to appeal granted; (2) Appeal allowed and the sentence imposed by his Honour Judge Maguire on 5 August 2004 quashed; (3) In lieu thereof, the respondent is sentenced to a term of imprisonment of 3 years which is to be taken to have commenced on 10 January 2004 and which will expire on 9 January 2007 with a non-parole period of 2 years which is to be taken to have commenced on 10 January 2004 and which will expire on 9 January 2006, on which date the respondent shall be released on parole; (4) It shall be a condition of such parole that; (a) the respondent be subject to supervision prescribed by the regulations under the Crimes (Administration of Sentences) Act 1999 during the period specified by those regulations, and; (b) immediately upon release on parole the respondent is to enter into a full-time drug rehabilitation program approved by his supervising parole officer and to remain in such program for as long as that officer considers it appropriate.
CATCHWORDS : CRIMINAL LAW - Sentence - Crown Appeal - Robbery whilst armed - Offence committed when on parole - Offender charged and sentenced while serving sentence of imprisonment for other offences - Sentence concurrent with pre-existing sentence - Sentence backdated - Sentence already expired when imposed - Sentencing judge imposed sentence as though he was sentencing at same time as earlier offences - Manifest inadequacy - Inappropriate, due to nature and serious of offence, to sentence as though sentence were being imposed at same time as earlier sentences - Totality LEGISLATION CITED : Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Crimes Act 1900 R v Henry & Ors (1999) 46 NSWLR 346 R v Pearce (1998) 194 CLR 610 R v Tran [1999] NSW CCA 109 R v Fernando [2002] NSW CCA 28 R v Vranic (NSW CCA 7 May 1991 unreported) CASES CITED : R v Cicekdag [2004] NSW CCA 357 Thompson (2000) 49 NSWLR 383 R v Kay [2004] NSWCCA 130 R v Cotter [2003] NSW CCA 273 R v KM [2004] NSW CCA 65 R v Hernando (2002) 136 A Crim R PARTIES : Regina Derek Louis Jones FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 2004/2247 CCAP COUNSEL : A: P Miller R: R Hulme SC SOLICITORS : A: S Kavanagh R: S O'Connor
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate