Select any passage to save a personal note with optional tags.
New South Wales
Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : R v Pearson [2004] NSWCCA 151
HEARING DATE(S) : 29 March 2004
JUDGMENT DATE :
13 May 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Sperling J at 1; Kirby J at 1; Bell J at 1
DECISION : Orders of the Court made on 7 May 2004 varied by substituting the following for order (3): (3) Sentence quashed and in lieu thereof the applicant be re-sentenced as follows: (a) In relation to Count 1, taking into account the offences on Form 1, a term of imprisonment for five years commencing on 18 November 2002, with a non-parole period of three years commencing on 18 November 2002 and expiring on 17 November 2005, that being the earliest date on which the applicant will be eligible for release on parole; (b) In relation to each of Counts 2 and 3, a term of imprisonment for three years commencing on 18 November 2002 with a non-parole period commencing on 18 November 2002 and expiring on 17 November 2004.
CATCHWORDS : No question of principle
CASES CITED : R v Pearson [2004] NSWCCA 129
PARTIES : Regina
David Wayne Pearson
FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60450/03
COUNSEL : Mr P G Ingram with Mr M Seymour for the Crown
Ms R Burgess for the Applicant
SOLICITORS : Director of Public Prosecutions
Legal Aid Commission of NSW for the Applicant
LOWER COURT District Court
JURISDICTION :
LOWER COURT 02/21/3393
FILE NUMBER(S) :
LOWER COURT Sides DCJ
JUDICIAL OFFICER :
- 1 -
IN THE COURT OF
CRIMINAL APPEAL
60450/03
Sperling J
Kirby J
Bell J
Thursday, 13 May 2004
Regina v David Wayne Pearson
Judgment
1 The Court: The orders made on 7 May 2004 (R v Pearson [2004] NSWCCA 129) failed to recognise that the appeal was against three concurrent sentences rather than against one sentence.
2 The orders of the Court made on 7 May 2004 should be varied by substituting the following for order (3):
(3) Sentence quashed and in lieu thereof the applicant be re-sentenced as follows:
(a) In relation to Count 1, taking into account the offences on Form 1, a term of imprisonment for five years commencing on 18 November 2002, with a non-parole period of three years commencing on 18 November 2002 and expiring on 17 November 2005, that being the earliest date on which the applicant will be eligible for release on parole;
(b) In relation to each of Counts 2 and 3, a term of imprisonment for three years commencing on 18 November 2002 with a non-parole period commencing on 18 November 2002 and expiring on 17 November 2004.
-oOo-
Last Modified: 05/14/2004
DISCLAIMER - Every effort has been made to comply with suppression orders or statutory provisions prohibiting publication that may apply to this judgment or decision. The onus remains on any person using material in the judgment or decision to ensure that the intended use of that material does not breach any such order or provision. Further enquiries may be directed to the Registry of the Court or Tribunal in which it was generated.