NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : R v Duong [2003] NSWCCA 55 revised - 10/03/2003 HEARING DATE(S) : 7 March 2003 JUDGMENT DATE : 7 March 2003
JUDGMENT OF : Giles JA at 1; Dunford J at 25; Smart AJ at 26 DECISION : Appeal dismissed.
CATCHWORDS : Criminal law - possession of heroin - whether necessary to direct jury that Crown had to negative the possibility that in the possession of someone else - direction depends on evidence and issue at trial - full directions on what was possession - including exclusivity and on burden and standard of proof - the specific direction not required - whether finding of guilt open to jury - finding open. M v The Queen, (1994) 181 CLR 207; R v Anderson, CCA, 15 December 1983, unreported; CASES CITED : R v Bazley, CCA, 23 March 1989, unreported; R v Filipetti, (1983) 13 A Crim R 335; R v Sobolewski, CCA, 21 April 1998, unreported; R v Trotter, [1999] NSWCCA 90. PARTIES : R v Thi Hong Hanh DUONG FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60258/02 COUNSEL : C V Jeffreys - Appellant R Hulme SC - Crown SOLICITORS : Jeffreys & Associates - Appellant S E O'Connor - Crown
LOWER COURT District Court JURISDICTION : LOWER COURT DC 02/21/3071 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Morgan DCJ JUDICIAL OFFICER :
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL CCA 60258/02 DC 01/21/3071
GILES JA DUNFORD J SMART AJ
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate