NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : Naumoski v NCR Australia Pty Ltd [2004] NSWCA 310 HEARING DATE(S) : 6 September 2004 JUDGMENT DATE : 10 September 2004
JUDGMENT OF : Spigelman CJ at 1; Giles JA at 2; Young CJ in Eq at 25 DECISION : Appeal allowed with costs. The respondent to have a certificate under the Suitors Fund Act if otherwise qualified.
CATCHWORDS : Liability for assisting in breach of trust - director of defaulting trustee - no knowledge of breach of trust - finding of deliberate shutting of eyes - whether facts entitled finding - held no - no question of principle. ND Barnes v Addy (1874) LR 9 Ch App 244; Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Clark (2003) 57 NSWLR 113; CASES CITED : Gauci v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1975) 135 CLR 81; Royal Brunei Airlines Sdn Bhd v Tan (1995) 2 AC 378; Steinberg v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1975) 134 CLR 640. PARTIES : Gina Naumoski - Appellant NCR Australia Pty Ltd - Respondent FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40218/04 COUNSEL : B W Rayment QC & G McVay - Appellant D McGovern SC & B Newton - Respondent SOLICITORS : McLachlan Chilton - Appellant Heidtman & Co - Respondent
LOWER COURT Supreme Court - Equity Division JURISDICTION : LOWER COURT SC 2316/00 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Austin J JUDICIAL OFFICER :
OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL CA 40218/04 SC 2316/00
SPIGELMAN CJ GILES JA YOUNG CJ in EQ
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate