NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Ryder v Frohlich [2005] NSWSC 1342
HEARING DATE(S) : 15/11/05
JUDGMENT DATE : 21 December 2005
JURISDICTION : Equity Division
JUDGMENT OF : Barrett J
DECISION : Refer to paragraphs 18 and 19
CATCHWORDS : PROCEDURE - documents produced on subpoena and notice to produce - claim for legal professional privilege - whether drafts of expert's report privileged - whether privilege waived in respect of other documents - responsibility of party bearing onus of establishing privilege
Evidence Act 1995, Part 3.10, Division 1 LEGISLATION CITED : Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, rule 1.9
Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Southcorp Ltd (2003) 46 ACSR 438 Gate Gourmet Australia Pty Ltd v Gate Gourmet Holding AG [2004] NSWSC 768 CASES CITED : Interchase Corporation Ltd v Grosvenor Hill (Queensland) Pty Ltd (No 1) [1999] 1 Qd R 141 Mann v Carnell (1999) 201 CLR 1 Temwell Pty Ltd v DKGR Holdings Pty Ltd [2003] FCA 948
Nicholas John Ryder - First Plaintiff Protected Equity Investments Pty Limited - Second Plaintiff PARTIES : Peter Frohlich - First Defendant Coastal Capital Limited - Second Defendant
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 2314/03
Mr G.T. Jackson, Solicitor - Plaintiffs COUNSEL : Mr R.G. McHugh - Defendants
Grahame Jackson & Associates - Plaintiffs SOLICITORS : Speed & Stracey Lawyers Pty Limited - Defendants
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION :
- 9 - IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES EQUITY DIVISION
BARRETT J
WEDNESDAY, 21 DECEMBER 2005
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate