NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 159 IR 52
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: MURRAY IRRIGATION LTD v BALSDON [2006] NSWCA 253
HEARING DATE(S): 01/08/2006
JUDGMENT DATE: 19 September 2006
JUDGMENT OF: Handley JA at 1; Ipp JA at 2; Bryson JA at 3
DECISION: Appeal allowed - see [60]
CATCHWORDS: EMPLOYMENT – termination – non-standard contractual terms dealing with termination and notice - Respondent employed on two-year contract as Manager Maintenance, Deniliquin was dismissed without notice for alleged breach in failing to give information required by employer about its affairs and property - Clause 36.2.8 provided "Termination of employment by MIL shall not be harsh, unjust or unreasonable" – clause 17 provided for payment of three months' wages in lieu of notice "… except in cases of acts of delinquency or incompetence." - respondent refused to give information because information asked for was relevant to criminal charges which Police had brought against him - held that in the circumstances insisting on information and terminating for breach was harsh, unjust or unreasonable and was in breach of contract - employment was terminated but employer was liable to damages for failing to give three months' notice - consideration whether respondent entitled to damages for loss of prospects of further employment after expiry of current two-year contract - held that he was not.
Constitution s.51(xxix) Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) s.249 LEGISLATION CITED: Industrial Relations Act 1996 (NSW) s.84(1) Industrial Relations Act 1988 (Cth) s.170DE(1) & (2) Suitors' Fund Act 1951 (NSW)
Associated Dominion Assurance Society Pty Ltd v Andrew & Haraldson (1949) 49 SR (NSW) 351 Baker v Commissioner of The Australian Federal Police (2000) 104 FCR 359 Commonwealth Of Australia v Amann Aviation Pty Ltd (1991) 174 CLR 64 Hadley v Baxendale (1854) 9 Exchequer 341 In Re Dispute – Board of Fire Commissioners Re Reports [1971] AR (NSW) 615 Kilburn v Enzed Precision Products (Australia) Pty Ltd (1988) 5 VIR 31 Martin v Tasmania Development And Resources [1999] FCA 593 CASES CITED: New South Wales Cancer Council v Sarfaty (1992) 28 NSWLR 68 Patty v Commonwealth Bank Of Australia (2000) 179 ALR 57 Re Matthews [2001] WASC 61 Regina v Travers (1957) 58 SR (NSW) 85 Reid v Howard (1995) 184 CLR 1 Ridge v Baldwin [1964] AC 40 State of Victoria v Commonwealth Of Australia (1996) 187 CLR 416 Tasmania Development & Resources v Martin [2000] FCA 414, (2000) 97 IR 66 Walker v Citigroup Global Markets Australia Pty Ltd [2006] FCAFC 101
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate