NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: R v Madigan [2005] NSWCCA 170
HEARING DATE(S): 12 April 2005
JUDGMENT DATE: 9 June 2005
JUDGMENT OF: Wood CJ at CL at 1; Grove J at 130; Hoeben J at 131
DECISION: 1. Appeal dismissed.
CATCHWORDS: Criminal Law - appeal against conviction - aggravated break and enter and commit serious indictable offence - plea of not guilty - whether trial judge erred in admitting surveillance log book into evidence - whether trial judge erred by admitting voice identification evidence - admission of expert evidence.
Criminal Appeal Act 1912 - s 6 LEGISLATION CITED: Evidence Act 1995 - s 55, 56(1), 79,135, 137, 165(1)(b), 165(2),177
Butera v The Director of Public Prosecutions (Vic)(1987) 164 CLR 180 Domican v The Queen (1992) 173 CLR 555 Driscoll v The Queen (1977) 137 CLR 517 Festa v The Queen (2001) 208 CLR 593 Li v The Queen (2003) 139 A Crim R 281 CASES CITED: R v Gao [2003] NSWCCA 390 R v GK (2001) 53 NSWLR 317 R v Lansdell [1995] NSWCCA 22 May 1995 R v Leung (1999) 47 NSWLR 405 R v Riscuta and Niga [2003] NSWCCA 6 R v Storey (1978) 140 CLR 364
Regina PARTIES: Andrew Paul Madigan
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2005/290
G Rowling (Crown) COUNSEL: T Watts
S Kavanagh SOLICITORS: S E O'Connor
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: District Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): 02/31/0462
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Patten DCJ
- 38 - IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 2005/290
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate