NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Attorney General v Bar-Mordecai [2005] NSWSC 142
16/11/04 HEARING DATE(S) : 18/11/04 19/11/04
JUDGMENT DATE : 25 February 2005
JURISDICTION : Common Law Division
DECISION : 1. That Michael Jacob Bar-Mordecai shall not, without leave of this court, institute proceedings in any court.; 2. That any legal proceedings instituted by Michael Jacob Bar-Mordecai, in any court before the date of this order shall not be continued by him without leave of this court.; 3. That Michael Jacob Bar-Mordecai pay the costs of these proceedings.; 4. The exhibits may be returned.; 5. That Michael Jacob Bar-Mordecai give not less than 3 days notice to Crown solicitor of any application to institute proceedings for leave pursuant to orders 1 and 2 above.
Supreme Court Act Family Provision Act LEGISLATION CITED : Conveyancy Act Corporations Act Medical Practice Act
Attorney Genreal v Bhattarcharya (unreported 10 December 2003) Attorney General v Betts (unreported 30 September 2004) CASES CITED : Attorney General v Wentworth (1988) 14 NSWLR 481 Re Venazza (1960) 1QB 197 Gallo v Attorney General (Full Court of Victoria unreported 4 September 1984)
Attorney General in and for the State of NSW PARTIES : Michael Jacob Bar-Mordecai
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 10622/04
Mr D Officer QC / Mr R C Titterton - Plaintiff COUNSEL : Mr M Bar-Mordecai in person - Defendant
I V Knight - Plaintiff SOLICITORS : Defendant in person
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate