NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: Harrigan v Regina [2005] NSWCCA 449
HEARING DATE(S): 15/12/2005
JUDGMENT DATE: 15 December 2005
JUDGMENT OF: Grove J at 52; James J at 1; Simpson J at 53
DECISION: Extension of time to make application for leave to appeal against sentence granted. Leave to appeal against sentence granted. Appeal dismissed
CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW – SENTENCE – guilty pleas - offences of - dangerous driving occasioning grievous bodily harm - doing an act intending to pervert the course of justice – whether the sentencing judge erred in failing to make the sentence for perverting the course of justice offence (either in whole or part) concurrent with the driving offence – totality principle
LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes Act
R v AEM [2002] NSWCCA 58 R v Duong (1999) 109 A Crim R 60 R v Giang [2001] NSWCCA 276 CASES CITED: R v Hammoud (2000) 118 A Crim R 66 R v Ruane (1979) 1 A Crim R 284 R v Weldon (2002) 136 A Crim R 55
PARTIES: Michael Leonard HARRIGAN v Regina
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2005/1486
P Lowe - Applicant COUNSEL: P Barnett - Crown
W Whitby - Applicant SOLICITORS: S Kavanagh - solicitor for Public Prosecutions
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: District Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): 02/21/0299
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Tupman DCJ
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL
2005/1486
GROVE J JAMES J SIMPSON J THURSDAY 15 DECEMBER 2005 MICHAEL HARRIGAN v REGINA
JUDGMENT
1 JAMES J: Michael Leonard Harrigan applies for an extension of time in which to apply for leave to appeal and, if an extension of time is granted, for leave to appeal against sentences imposed on him in the District Court on 27 February 2003 by her Honour Judge Tupman for two offences to which he had pleaded guilty. 2 The two offences were:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate