NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
Regina v Wayne Robert Moore [2005] NSWCCA 212 CITATION: This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
HEARING DATE(S): 01/06/05
JUDGMENT DATE: 17 June 2005
JUDGMENT OF: Studdert J at 1; Howie J at 2; Latham J at 3
DECISION: 1. Leave granted to appeal; 2. Appeal dismissed
CATCHWORDS: Possession of prohibited imports (MDMA) - sentence - departure from usual proportion between head sentence and non parole period - Assistance and plea of guilty - discount.
LEGISLATION CITED: Customs Act 1901
Chan (2002) 128 A Crim R 119 Shepherd (2003) NSW CCA 287 A (2004) NSW CCA 292: R v Barrientos (1999) NSW CCA 1 at par 45 Su (1997) 1 VR 1 CASES CITED: R v Chu NSWCCA (Unreported) 16/10/98 R v Bernier (1998) 102 A Crim R 44 R v Bugeja [2001] NSWCCA 196 per Adams J R v W [2002] NSWCCA 192. R v Waqa (No.2) 2005 NSWCCA 33
Crown PARTIES: Wayne Robert Moore - Applicant
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2005/485
M Kelly - Crown COUNSEL: T Watts - Applicant
S Kavanagh - Crown SOLICITORS: S O'Connor - Applicant
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: District Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): 04/11/0470
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Kinchington DCJ
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 2005/485
STUDDERT J HOWIE J LATHAM J
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate