NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: Regina v Saleib [2005] NSWCCA 85
HEARING DATE(S): 14/3/05
JUDGMENT DATE: 29 March 2005
JUDGMENT OF: Adams J at 1; Bell J at 2; Hall J at 74
DECISION: 1. Grant leave to appeal; 2. Dismiss the appeal
LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999
Mill v R (1988) 166 CLR 59 R v Fernando (2002) NSWCCA 28 CASES CITED: R v Gallagher (1991) 23 NSWLR 220 R v Murchie (1999) 108 A Crim R 424 R v Way [2004] NSWCCA 131; 60 NSWLR 168 at 198
Farid Saleib (Applicant) PARTIES: Regina (Respondent)
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2004/3219
J Girdham (Crown) COUNSEL: P Lakatos / K Avenell (Applicant)
S Kavanagh SOLICITORS: S O'Connor (Applicant)
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: District Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): 03/21/1156 & 04/21/1002
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Knight DCJ
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 2004/3219
ADAMS J BELL J HALL J
Tuesday 29 March 2005 Regina v Farid Saleib Judgment 1 ADAMS J: I agree with Bell J. 2 BELL J: This is an application for leave to appeal against the severity of sentences imposed on the applicant by his Honour Judge Knight (the Judge) in the District Court at Penrith on 5 March 2004 (as corrected with respect to the specification of the non-parole period for the offence charged in count 2 by order made on 9 March 2004).
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate