NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 143 LGERA 319
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: Melaleuca Estate Pty Ltd v Port Stephens Council [2006] NSWCA 31
HEARING DATE(S): 9 & 10 June 2005
JUDGMENT DATE: 1 March 2006
JUDGMENT OF: Giles JA at 1; McColl JA at 93; Hunt AJA at 94
DECISION: (1) Appeal allowed; (2) Set aside the orders of Cripps AJ made on 19 May 2004; (3) Make orders - (a) granting an injunction restraining the respondent from continuing to discharge upon the appellant's land stormwater in excess of the natural flow that would flow upon the land; (b) that the respondent take such measures as may be necessary to preclude the coming onto the land of stormwater containing high levels of nutrients and waster materials; and (c) that the injunction set out in paragraphs (a) and (b) be stayed for eighteen months pending the implementation of a drainage system by the respondent for the Seabreeze Estate which enables the stormwater to be controlled within the catchment or disposed of by a thrust bore drainage line or gravity drainage line, to the next catchment in Port Stephens; (4) Order that the respondent pay the appellant's costs of the trial and the appeal; (5) Order that the respondent have a certificate under the Suitors Fund Act if otherwise qualified.
CATCHWORDS: Nuisance - claim for injunction to restrain - approval of development and drainage works in 1970s and 1990s - pipes discharged onto and at boundary of plaintiff's land - whether a nuisance - whether defendant liable for nuisance - in particular whether works without regard for landowner's interests - consideration of liability for works carried out under statutory power - whether defence by virtue of s 241 Local Government Act 1919 - whether "good faith" defence under s 733 Local Government Act 1993.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate