NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Simons v Permanent Trustee Co Ltd: Estate D. Hakim [2005] NSWSC 223
HEARING DATE(S) : 15 and 16 March, 2005
JUDGMENT DATE : 18 March 2005
JURISDICTION : Equity Division
JUDGMENT OF : Palmer J
DECISION : Further provision out of the estate ordered for the daughter; claims of grandchildren dismissed.
CATCHWORDS : FAMILY PROVISION ACT - EXTENSION OF TIME - Whether sufficient cause for delay shown. - ELIGIBLE PERSON - Whether grandchildren wholly or partially dependent upon testator - what is "dependence" - whether emotional, not financial, dependence is sufficient for purposes of s.6(1)(d). - ADEQUATE PROVISION - Large estate - claim by daughter - all other beneficiaries well provided for - whether adequate provision made for daughter - extent of daughter's needs.
Family Provision Act 1982 (NSW) - s.6, s.7, s.16 LEGISLATION CITED : Wills Probate and Administration 1898 (NSW) - s.93
- Anasson v Phillips (unrep) NSWSC 4 March 1988 - Fulop, Re (1987) 8 NSWLR 679 - Leahey & Trescowthick [1999] VSC 409 - MacEwan Shaw v Shaw [2003] VSC 318 - O'Dea v O'Dea [2005] NSWSC 46 CASES CITED : - Pearson v Jones [2000] NSWSC 799 - Petrohilos v Hunter (1991) 25 NSWLR 343 - Sayer v Sayer [1999] NSWCA 340 - Tsivinsky v Tsivinsky (unrep) NSWCA, 5 December 1991 - Warren v McKnight (1996) 40 NSWLR 390
Mariane Hakim Simons - First-named Plaintiff David Joshua Edgeworth Simons - Second-named Plaintiff - Ceased to be a party: 13.12.04 James Lloyd Simons - Third-named Plaintiff Mijanou Celina Ariane Zigane - Fourth-named Plaintiff PARTIES : Giselle Marise Phillipa Simons - Fifth-named Plaintiff Permanent Trustee Company Limited - First-named Defendant Claude Hakim - Second-named Defendant Muriel Betty Ginges - Third-named Defendant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate