NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 157 A Crim R 80
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
Regina v Nguyen; Regina v Pham; Regina v Vu; Regina v To [2005] NSWCCA 362 CITATION: This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
HEARING DATE(S): 26 April 2005
JUDGMENT DATE: 31 October 2005
JUDGMENT OF: Grove J at 1; Barr J at 108; Howie J at 109
DECISION: APPEALS AGAINST SENTENCE ALLOWED; APPELLANTS RESENTENCED
CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW AND PROCEDURE - SENTENCE - DRUG DEALING - WHETHER SENTENCES EXCESSIVE - PARITY
Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Customs Act 1901 (Cth)
Briginshaw v Briginshaw 1938 60 CLR 356 Pearce v The Queen 1998 194 CLR 610 Postiglione v The Queen 1997 189 CLR 295 R v Moore [2005] NSWCCA 47 R v Nai Poon [2003] NSWCA 47 CASES CITED: R v Neale [2004] NSWCCA 311 R v Stambouli 2003 141 A Crim R 531 R v Storey 1998 1 VR 359 The Queen v Olbrich 1999 199 CLR 270 Weininger v The Queen 2003 212 CLR 629 Wong v The Queen 2001 207 CLR 584
Regina v Nguyen Thanh Hai Regina v Pham Van Hau PARTIES: Regina v Vu Quang Huy Regina v To Kam Pui
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2004/2827; 2004/2828; 2002/109; 2005/694
M. Allnutt (Crown) M. Ramage QC (Apt: Nguyen) COUNSEL: P. Boulten SC (Apt: Pham) P. Hamill SC (Apt: Vu) P. Byrne SC (Apt: To)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate