NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : (2005) NSW ConvR 56-120
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Picwoods P/L v Panagopoulos & 1 Or [2004] NSWSC 978 HEARING DATE(S) : 06/09/04, 14/10/04, 15/10/04 JUDGMENT DATE : 18 October 2004
JUDGMENT OF : White J DECISION : 1. Order defendants pay to plaintiff the sum of $10,042.60; 2. dismiss the further amended summons; 3. order that the plaintiff pay the defendants costs of the proceedings other than the costs for the preparation of the first defendants affidavit of 17/03/04; 4. exhibits may be returned after 28 days.
CATCHWORDS : Agreement to lease - Whether a binding agreement existed between the parties - Whether parties intended to be immediately bound by initialling the document - Essential terms - Failure to specify a commencement date for the lease . - Agency - Agreement not initialled by second defendant - Whether first defendant purported to enter into agreement on behalf of wife (second defendant) - Whether first defendant had authority to contract on behalf of wife. LEGISLATION CITED : Real Property Act 1900 Conveyancing Act 1919 Australian Broadcasting v XIV Commonwealth Games (1988) 18 NSWLR 540 Darling Point Securities Pty Limited v Industrial Equity Pty Limited (NSWCA, 09/07/91, BC9101808) Seleva v Klaskova (Powell J, 15/03/88, unreported) Perry v Saunders (1961) 104 CLR 149 Brilliant v Michaels [1945] 1 ER 121 Whitlock v Brew (1968) 11 CLR 597 Harvey v Pratt (1965) 2 All ER 786 CASES CITED : Marshall v Berridge (1981) 19 Ch D 233 Godecke v Kirwan (1973) 129 CLR 269 Powell & Berry v Jones & Jones (1968) SASR 394 Sweet & Maxwell Ltd v Universal News Limited (1964) 2 QB 699 Field v Shoalhaven Transport (1970) 3 NSWLR at 103 Pola v Commonwealth Bank of Australia (Sundberg J, 19/12/97, unreported) Baloglow v Konstantinidis (2001) NSWCA 451 Dillon v Nash [1950] VLR 293 Parker v Manessis [1974] WAR 54 PARTIES : Picwoods Pty Limited v Konstantinos Panagopoulos & 1 Or FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 6214/03 COUNSEL : Plaintiff: A Fernon Defendant: In Person SOLICITORS : Plaintiff: David Landa Stewart Lawyers Defendant: N/A
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate