NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Van Zonneveld v Seaton [2004] NSWSC 960 HEARING DATE(S) : 12/10/04-15/10/04 JUDGMENT DATE : 13 October 2004 JURISDICTION: Equity JUDGMENT OF : Campbell J DECISION : Evidence rejected
CATCHWORDS : EVIDENCE - facts excluded from proof - Evidence Act 1995 section 122(1) - evidence given with consent - Evidence Act 1995 section 122(2) - Evidence Act 1995 section 122(4) - disclosure of substance of evidence LEGISLATION CITED : Evidence Act 1995 Property (Relationships) Act 1984 ASIC v Rich [2004] NSWSC 923 Ford Dodge Australia Pty Ltd v Nature Vet Pty Ltd [2002] FCA 501 Garratt's Ltd v Thanga Thangathurai [2002] NSWSC 39 Gordian Run-Off v Price [2004] NSWSC 600 Mann v Carnell (1999) 201 CLR 1 CASES CITED : Perpetual Trustees Victoria Limited v Richard Kingsley Sheehan [2004] NSWSC 294 Singapore Airlines v Sydney Airports Corporation [2004] NSWSC 380 Telstra Corporation v Australis Media Holdings [No 2] (1997) 41 NSWLR 346 Telstra Corporation Ltd v BT Australasia Pty Ltd (1998) 85 FCR 152 Travel Compensation Fund v John Harvey Blair [2004] NSWSC 501 United Rural Enterprises v Lopmand [2002] NSWSC 1142 Wayne Lawrence Pty Limited v Hunt [1999] NSWSC 1044 PARTIES : John Cornelius Joseph Van Zonneveld - Plaintiff Birthe Kristine Adsbol Seaton - Defendant FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 1672/02 COUNSEL : M Gilbert - Plaintiff R Schonell - Defendant SOLICITORS : Harris Hyde Page Delaney Lawyers
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate