NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Croker v Commonwealth of Australia & Anor [2005] NSWSC 994
HEARING DATE(S) : 29/09/2005
JUDGMENT DATE : 5 October 2005
JUDGMENT OF : Hoeben J at 1
DECISION : Summons dismissed.
CATCHWORDS : Jurisdiction of Consumer Trader and Tenancy Tribunal of NSW - does Tribunal have jurisdiction to make orders binding the Commonwealth of Australia.
Consumer Claims Act 1998 Consumer Trader and Tenancy Tribunal Act 2001 LEGISLATION CITED : Fair Trading Act 1987 Interpretation Act 1987 Residential Tenancies Act 1987
CASES CITED : Re: The Residential Tenancies Tribunal of NSW v Henderson & Anor, Ex Parte the Defence Housing Authority (1997) 190 CLR 410
Clayton Robert Croker - Plaintiff PARTIES : Commonwealth of Australia - First Defendant Consumer, Trader and Tenancy Tribunal of NSW - Second Defendant
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 30060/2005
Plaintiff in Person COUNSEL : Ms R Pepper - First Defendant Submitting Appearance - Second Defendant
Plaintiff in Person SOLICITORS : Australian Government Solicitor - First Defendant IV Knight, Crown Solicitor - Second Defendant
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : Consumer Trader and Tenancy Tribunal of NSW
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 05/14570
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER : Registrar of Consumer Trader and Tenancy Tribunal of NSW
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION
HOEBEN J
Wednesday, 5 October, 2005
30060/2005 – Clayton Robert CROKER v COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA & Anor
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate