NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: Samootin v Shea & Ors [2005] NSWCA 16
HEARING DATE(S): 7 February 2005
JUDGMENT DATE: 17 February 2005
JUDGMENT OF: Giles JA
DECISION: Amended notice of motion dismissed; Ms Samootin pay costs on an indemnity basis.
CATCHWORDS: Application for stays of "judgments" and costs orders - various proceedings - current application for leave to appeal in principal proceedings - a number of applications filed seeking special leave to appeal to High Court - leave to appeal relevantly refused at earlier time - no prospect of appeal - or of special leaves to appeal - application in large part misconceived and wholly without substance - dismissed with indemnity costs. ND
Alexandra Samootin - Claimant Christopher George Shea - First Opponent Peter John Deans - Second Opponent Loan Design Pty Ltd - Third Opponent PARTIES: S R Deans Pty Ltd - Fourth Opponent Giselle M Wagner - Fifth Opponent Adrian Holmes - Sixth Opponent
FILE NUMBER(S): CA 40603/04
Claimant in person COUNSEL: B Muir - Second to Fourth Opponents J Reid - Fifth and Sixth Opponents
Brian Muir & Company - Second to Fourth Opponents SOLICITORS: Mallesons Stephen Jaques - Fifth and Sixth Opponents
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: Supreme Court - Equity Division
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): 1973/01
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Palmer J
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL CA 40603/04 ED 1973/01
GILES JA
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate