NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Silver v Dome Resources NL [2005] NSWSC 348
HEARING DATE(S) : 8 & 11 April 2005
JUDGMENT DATE : 12 April 2005
JURISDICTION : Equity
JUDGMENT OF : Hamilton J
DECISION : Letter from director complaining of incorrectness of minutes of directors meeting of company admitted as business record.
CATCHWORDS : EVIDENCE [121] - Documentary evidence - Statutory provisions relating to business records - In general - Representations made in course of or for purposes of business - What constitute.
LEGISLATION CITED : Evidence Act 1995 ss 69, 135
ASIC v Whitlam (2002) 42 ACSR 407 Assaf v Skalkos [1999] NSWSC 1329 Harrington-Smith (on behalf of the Wongatha People) v Western Australia (No 8) (2004) 207 ALR 483 Lewis v Nortex Pty Ltd (In Liq); Lamru Pty Ltd v Kation Pty Ltd [2002] NSWSC 1083 CASES CITED : Ringrow Pty Ltd v BP Australia Ltd (2003) 130 FCR 569 Roach v Page (No 15) [2003] NSWSC 939 Roach v Page (No 27) [2003] NSWSC 1046 Schipp v Cameron (No 3) NSWSC 9 October 1997 unreported Einstein J
Michael Bernard Silver (P1 & XD1) Fair Choice Limited (P2 & XD2) PARTIES : Dome Resources NL (D1 & XC1) Durban Roodepoort Deep Limited (D2 x XC2)
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 2586/01
J E Thomson and M J Watts (Ps & XDs) COUNSEL : T G R Parker (Ds & XCs)
Bull, Son & Schmidt (Ps & XDs) SOLICITORS : Allens Arthur Robinson (Ds & XCs)
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION :
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES EQUITY DIVISION
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate