NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: Novotny v. Cropley [2005] NSWCA 26
HEARING DATE(S): 9 February 2005
JUDGMENT DATE: 9 February 2005
JUDGMENT OF: Handley JA at 1; Hodgson JA at 2; Santow J at 22
DECISION: Summons dismissed.
CATCHWORDS: CONTEMPT OF COURT - Tendency to interfere with course of justice - Allegation of pressure on unrepresented litigant - Allegation of causing unreasonable delay - Whether client responsible for solicitor's conduct.
Attorney-General's Reference (No.2 of 1999) [2000] QB 796. Bhagat v. Global Custodians Ltd. [2002] NSWCA 160 CASES CITED: Forestview Nominees Pty. Ltd. v. Perron Investments Pty. Ltd. (1999) 160 ALR 482 Meridian Global Funds Management Asia Ltd. v. Securities Commission [1995] AC 500 Supply of Readymix Concrete No.2; Re [1995] AC 456
Jiri Novotny - claimant PARTIES: Jennifer Eirian Cropley - opponent
FILE NUMBER(S): CA 40773/04
COUNSEL: Mr. Novotny appeared for himself
SOLICITORS: McCabe Terrill, Sydney for opponent
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: Local Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL CA 40773/04
HANDLEY JA HODGSON JA SANTOW JA
Wednesday 9 February 2005 NOVOTNY V. CROPLEY Judgment
1 HANDLEY JA: I will ask Hodgson JA to give the first judgment. 2 HODGSON JA: The proceedings now before the Court were commenced by summons filed on 13 September 2004, in which the claimant Dr Novotny sought a declaration that the opponent Jennifer Cropley is guilty of contempt, and also sought some consequential relief. The contempt alleged was that the opponent attempted to pressurise improperly the claimant to settle legal proceedings by "inviting" the claimant to withdraw his appeal, and groundlessly referring to his case as "hopeless". 3 The appeal in question is that in proceedings No.40638/04 in the Court of Appeal, in respect of which leave to appeal was granted on 10 September 2004, and which was heard on 9 December 2004. On that day judgment was given by Mason P, concurred in by myself and Santow JA, which inter alia set out the relevant history of that appeal. 4 One basis of the contempt charge is a letter dated 26 July 2004 sent by the opponent's solicitors McCabe Terrill to the claimant, which was in the following terms: COURT OF APPEAL No. 40368 OF 2004 JIRI NOVOTNY v JENNIFER EIRIAN CROPLEY. We enclose by way of service, the Opponent's Response filed in the Court of Appeal on 26 July 2004.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate