NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Cook v Endovasive P/L & Ors [2004] NSWSC 876 HEARING DATE(S) : 6 September 2004 JUDGMENT DATE : 23 September 2004 JURISDICTION: Common Law JUDGMENT OF : Master Harrison DECISION : (1) The plantiff be granted an extension of the limitation period up to and including 23 September 2004 as against the second and third defendants; (2) The plaintiff is to pay the second and third defendants' costs as agreed or assessed.
CATCHWORDS : Extension of time to commence proceedings - ss 60C & E Limitation Act 1969 (NSW) LEGISLATION CITED : Limitation Act 1969 (NSW) ss 60 C & E Limitation of Action Act 1974 (Qld) - s 11 BHP Steel (AIS) Pty Limited v Giudice (& Ors) (NSWCA, unreported 7 March 1997) Brisbane South Regional Health Authority v Taylor (1996) 186 CLR 541; 129 ALR 1 Council of the City of Sydney v Zegarac (1998) 43 NSWLR 195 CASES CITED : Holt v Wynter (2000) 49 NWLR 128 McLean v Sydney Water Corporation [2001] NSWCA 122 Milperra Marketing Pty Ltd & Ors v Bayliss [2001] NSWCA 315 Murray v Whiting & Ors [2002] QSC 257 Wintle v Conayust (Vic) Pty Ltd & Ors [1989] VR 951 Deneta Cook (Plaintiff)
Endovasive Pty Limited (First Defendant) PARTIES : Dr Niven (Second Defendant)
Wentworth Area Health Service (Third Defendant) FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 20119/2002 Mr R Page (Plaintiff) COUNSEL : Mr S Woods (Second & Third Defendants) Mr R Glover, Glover & Glover (Plaintiff) SOLICITORS : Ms R Simpson, Frances Allpress (Second & Third Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate