NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
R v MDB [2005] NSWCCA 354 CITATION: This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
HEARING DATE(S): 19 October 2005
JUDGMENT DATE: 7 November 2005
JUDGMENT OF: Simpson J at 1; Adams J at 46; Johnson J at 47
DECISION: Appeal dismissed
CATCHWORDS: aggravated indecent assault - appeal against conviction - admissibility of evidence - Evidence Act credibility rule - evidence of a prior consistent statement - circumstances leading to statement - directions on complaint and delay
Crimes Act 1900, s61M(1) LEGISLATION CITED: Criminal Procedure Act 1986, s294B Evidence Act 1995, s66, s102, s108(3)(b), s136, s192
Crampton v The Queen [2000] HCA 60; 206 CLR 161 Doggett v The Queen [2001] HCA 46; 208 CLR 343 Graham v The Queen [1998] HCA 61; 195 CLR 606 Longman v The Queen [1989] HCA 60; 168 CLR 79 R v DBG [2002] NSW 328; 133 A Crim R 227 CASES CITED: R v Esho [2001]NSWCCA 415 R v Folli [2001] NSWCCA 531 R v KJ [2005] VSCA 153, unreported, 23 June 2005 R v Reardon, Michaels and Taylor [2002] NSWCCA 203 R v Stevens [2001] NSWCCA 330 Stanoevski v The Queen [2001] HCA 4; 202 CLR 115
Crown - Respondent PARTIES: MDB - Appellant
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2005/1180
W Dawe QC - Crown COUNSEL: T Game SC - Appellant
S Kavanagh - Crown SOLICITORS: Giddy & Crittenden - Appellant
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: District Court
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate