NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Mulkearns v Chandos Developments Pty Ltd (No 4) [2005] NSWSC 511
HEARING DATE(S) : 09/03/05
JUDGMENT DATE : 1 June 2005
JURISDICTION : Equity Division
JUDGMENT OF : Young CJ in Eq
DECISION : Defendant to pay second plaintiff $297,209.
CATCHWORDS : CONVEYANCING [74][95]- Breach- Vendor paid licence fees for occupation of purchaser- Fees to be deducted from balance of purchase monies- Breach by purchaser- Whether recovery allowed to purchaser- Whether purchaser to be compensated for increase in value of property because of improvements made whilst in possession- Whether deposit should be forfeited. ESTOPPEL [41]- Election- Forensic election- Plaintiff chose not to pursue claim for deposit at original hearing- No evidence that plaintiff needed to choose between two inconsistent courses. EVIDENCE [96]- Without prejudice offer of settlement- Admissible for purpose of contradicting evidence that may mislead Court- Evidence Act 1995, s 131(2)(g). PROCEDURE [107]- Notice of motion- Return of deposit- Capacity of Court to hear motion for return of deposit where claim not made in original specific performance suit- Preferable for deposit claim to be heard simultaneously with specific performance suit but not imperative.
Conveyancing Act 1919, s 55(2A) Evidence Act 1995, s 131 LEGISLATION CITED : Law of Property Act 1925 (Eng), s 49(2) Supreme Court Act 1970, s 63 Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth)
Bennett v Stuart (1927) 27 SR (NSW) 317 Benyon v Wongala Holdings Pty Ltd (1999) 9 BPR 16,781 Bernard v Weingarth (1997) 8 BPR 15,651 Berry v Mahony [1933] VLR 314 Brown v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (2001) 187 ALR 714 Carringville Pty Ltd v The Gatto Group Pty Ltd (2003) 11 BPR 21,069 Clancy v Salienta Pty Ltd (2000) 11 BPR 20,425 Clarke v Dilberovic (1982) NSW Conv R 55-083 Clurstock Pty Ltd v Timanu Pty Ltd (1988) NSW Conv R 55-419 Eighth SRJ Pty Ltd v Merity (1997) 7 BPR 15,189 Forgeard v Shanahan (1994) 35 NSWLR 206 Harkins v Butcher (2002) 55 NSWLR 558 Hasanovic v Polistena (1982) NSW Conv R 55-078 Heyman v Darwins Ltd [1942] AC 356 Howe v Smith (1884) 27 Ch D 89 Huber v Conroy [1982] 2 NSWLR 143 Hythe Corp v East (1866) LR 1 Eq 620 Inmer (No 145) Pty Ltd v Uniting Church in Australia Property Trust (NSW) (1993) 182 CLR 26 James Macara Ltd v Barclay [1944] 2 All ER 31 James Macara Ltd v Barclay [1945] KB 148 Laird v Pim (1841) 7 M & W 474; 151 ER 852 Lexane Pty Ltd v Highfern Pty Ltd [1985] 1 Qd R 446 Lucantonio v Ciofuli (2003) 11 BPR 21,181 Lucas & Tait (Investments) Pty Ltd v Victoria Securities Ltd [1973] 2 NSWLR 268 CASES CITED : McDonald v Dennys Lascelles Ltd (1993) 48 CLR 457 One Spencer St Pty Ltd v Maryland International Pty Ltd [2005] NSWSC 275 PC Developments Pty Ltd v Revell (1991) 22 NSWLR 615 Poort v Development Underwriting (Victoria) Pty Ltd [1976] VR 779 Poort v Development Underwriting (Victoria) Pty Ltd (No 2) [1977] VR 454 Port of Melbourne Authority v Anshun Pty Ltd (1981) 147 CLR 589 Pratt v Hawkins (1991) 32 NSWLR 319 Ramsden v Dyson (1866) LR 1 HL 129 Romanos v Pentagold Investments Pty Ltd (2003) 77 ALJR 1882 Schindler v Pigault (1975) 30 P & CR 328 Shevill v Builders Licensing Board (1980) 2 BPR 9662 Shevill v Builders Licensing Board (1982) 149 CLR 620 Southcomb v Exeter (Bishop) (1847) 6 Hare 213; 67 ER 1145 Sunstar Fruit Pty Ltd v Cosmo [1995] 2 Qd R 214 Tanwar Enterprises Pty Ltd v Cauchi (2002) NSW Conv R 55-994 Tanwar Enterprises Pty Ltd v Cauchi (2003) 77 ALJR 1853 Terry v Permanent Trustee Australia Ltd (1995) 6 BPR 14,091 Timanu Pty Ltd v Clurstock (1988) 15 NSWLR 338 Todd v Gee (1810) 17 Ves 273; 34 ER 106 Universal Corp v Five Ways Properties Ltd [1978] 3 All ER 1131 Universal Corp v Five Ways Properties Ltd [1979] 1 All ER 552 Webster v Havyn Pty Ltd [2004] NSWSC 227 Westmacott v Robins (1862) 4 De GF & J 390; 45 ER 1234 Wight v Foran (1987) 11 NSWLR 470
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate