NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: Regina v Graham [2005] NSWCCA 127
HEARING DATE(S): 1 April 2005
JUDGMENT DATE: 1 April 2005
JUDGMENT OF: Grove J at 1; Howie J at 36; Hall J at 37
DECISION: APPEAL DISMISSED
CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW AND PROCEDURE - TRIAL - ACCUSED GIVES AND CALLS NO EVIDENCE - ESSENTIAL ISSUE OF KNOWLEDGE OF PRESENCE OF DRUGS IN DESPATCHED PACKAGE - DENIAL BY ACCUSED IN LENGTHY VIDEO INTERVIEW - FAVOURABLE DIRECTION TO ACCUSED THAT CONTENT OF VIDEO AVAILABLE TO JURY IN SAME WAY AS OTHER EVIDENCE - NO APPLICATION FOR DIRECTION OTHERWISE - NO MISCARRIAGE - RULE 4 APPLICABLE - VERDICT NOT UNREASONABLE
s12 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 LEGISLATION CITED: Criminal Appeal Act 1912 s38 Evidence Act 1995
Azzopardi v The Queen 2001 205 CLR 50 R v Abusafiah 1991 24 NSWLR 531 R v Bozzola [2001] NSWCCA 8 R v Giri [2001] NSWCCA 197 R v Knight, unreported CCA 18 December 1990 R v Morris 2004 147 A Crim R 99 CASES CITED: R v OGD 1997 45 NSWLR 744 R v SMR [2002] NSWCCA 258 R v Prasad 1979 2 A Crim R 45 R v Richards 2002 128 A Crim R 204 R v Tripodina 1988 35 A Crim R 183 R v Wilson [2005] NSWCCA 20
PARTIES: Regina v Kelly Anne Graham
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2004/3312
P. Barrett (Crown) COUNSEL: H. Dhanji (Applicant)
S. Kavanagh (DPP) SOLICITORS: D. Anderson (Applicant)
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: District Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): 03/11/0827
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate