NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: British American Tobacco Australia Ltd v Eagle Star Reinsurance Co Ltd [2006] NSWCA 156
HEARING DATE(S): 1 June 2006
JUDGMENT DATE: 23 June 2006
JUDGMENT OF: Giles JA at 1; Hodgson JA at 68; Tobias JA at 78
DECISION: (1) Appeal allowed; (2) Set aside the verdict for the cross-defendant on the third cross-claim and the order that the cross-claimant pay the cross-defendant's costs; (3) Remit the third cross-claim to the District Court for a new trial on the condition that the appellant was to be indemtified as if a separate policy had been issued to it in accordance with General Clause 1; (4) Costs of the third cross-claim to be as ordered by the judge conducting the trial; (5) Respondent to pay the appellant's costs of the appeal.
CATCHWORDS: Insurance - defendant's costs of defending proceedings - whether claimed in statement of claim - whether claim raised in submissions for decision although not in statement of claim - whether failure to give reasons for not deciding claim or why claim failed - whether miscarriage of justice - whether appeal court would decide claim - held raised for decision, inadequate reasons, new trial. D
Beale v Government Insurance Office of New South Wales (1997) 48 NSWLR 430; Edwards v Insurance Office of Australia Ltd (1933) 34 SR 88; GLG Australia Pty Ltd v The Nominal Defendant (No 2) [2004] NSWCA 282; CASES CITED: Hadid v Redpath (2001) 31 MLVR 152; Mifsud v Campbell (1991) 21 NSWLR 725; Penrith City Council v Government Insurance Office of New South Wales (1991) 24 NSWLR 564; Peter Turnbull & Co Pty Ltd v Mundus Trading Co (Australasia) Pty Ltd (1954) 90 CLR 235; Soulemezis v Dudley (Holdings) Ltd (1987) 10 NSWLR 247.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate