NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : MK and JA Roche Pty Limited & Ors v Metro Edgley Pty Limited & Anor [2004] NSWSC 724 HEARING DATE(S) : 9/08/04 JUDGMENT DATE : 9 August 2004
JURISDICTION: Equity Division Commercial List JUDGMENT OF : Einstein J DECISION : Applications dismissed. Costs reserved.
CATCHWORDS : Summary dismissal - Whether Equity Division proceedings comprise 'a trial of a common law claim' within the meaning of Part 34 rule 7 of Supreme Court Rules Judicature Act LEGISLATION CITED : Supreme Court Act 1970 Supreme Court Rules MK & JA Roche Pty Limited (ABN 25 076 529 952) (First Plaintiff) PARTIES : Michael Kevin Roche, Christopher John Roche, William Timothy Roche, Kevin Michael Roche, Gabrielle Mary Roche (Second Plaintiff) Metro Edgley Pty Limited (ABN 37 082 440 042) (First Defendant) Multiplex Limited (formerly Multiplex Constructions Pty Limited (ACN 008 687 063) (Second Defendant) FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 50069/04 COUNSEL : Mr DJ Hammerschlag SC, Mr VF Kerr (Plaintiffs) Mr CR Newlinds SC, Ms RS Francois (Defendants) SOLICITORS : Lane & Lane (Plaintiffs) Clayton Utz (Defendants)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES EQUITY DIVISION COMMERCIAL LIST
Einstein J
Monday 9 August 2004 ex tempore Revised 18 August 2004
50069/04 MK and JA Roche Pty Limited & Ors v Metro Edgley Pty Limited & Anor
JUDGMENT The proceedings 1 These proceedings concern two related contracts, each dated 26 September 2003: · a contract entitled "Waterfront Brassier Development Contract, Luna Park" ["The Development Contract"]". · a contract entitled "Liquor Licence and Fit-out Works Deed of Agreement Waterfront Brasserie Luna Park" ["The Fit-out Deed"]". 2 The first plaintiff, MK and JA Roche Pty Limited, and the second defendants, Messrs MK, CJ, WT, KM Roche and Ms GM Roche, ["the guarantors"], entered into the development contract with the first defendant, Metro Edgley Pty Limited ["Metro Edgley"], and the second defendant, Multiplex Ltd (Formerly Multiplex Construction Pty Limited) ["Multiplex"]. 3 Apparently, the proposed development was to be and is being constructed inside the entrance to the Luna Park complex. The Development Contract 4 Clause 1 of the development contract provides that:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate