NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
R v Capar [2005] NSWCCA 402 CITATION: This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
HEARING DATE(S): 7 October 2005
JUDGMENT DATE: 7 October 2005
JUDGMENT OF: McClellan CJ at CL at 1; Grove J at 32; Hislop J at 33
DECISION: Appeal dismissed
CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW - appeal against sentence - supply of drugs - money laundering - possessing a firearm - whether sentencing judge erred in respect of the discount for the plea of guilty
Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 Confiscation of Proceeds of Crimes Act 1989 LEGISLATION CITED: Firearms Act 1996 Crimes Act 1900
Malvaso v The Queen (1989) 168 CLR 227 R v Atonio [2005] NSWCCA 200 R v Carter [2001] NSWCCA 245 R v Gorgievski [2002] NSWCCA 45 R v Lowe [2001] NSWCCA 271 R v OPA [2004] NSWCCA 464 CASES CITED: R v Parkinson (2001) 125 A Crim R 1 R v Petrie (2003) 141 A Crim R 396 R v Rogerson [2005] NSWCCA 12 R v Simpson (2001) 53 NSWLR 704 R v Sutton [2004] NSWCCA 225 R v Thomson & Houlton (2000) 115 A Crim R 104 R v Vukic [2003] NSWCCA 13
The Crown PARTIES: Kanan Capar (Appl)
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2005/384
N Norman (Crown) COUNSEL: P Byrne SC (Appl)
Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Crown) SOLICITORS: Croke & Co (Appl)
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: District Court
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate