NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
M A Partitioning & Ceilings Pty Ltd v Kezic [2005] NSWCA 414 CITATION: This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
HEARING DATE(S): 8 November 2005
JUDGMENT DATE: 25 November 2005
JUDGMENT OF: Santow JA at 1; Bryson JA at 75; Hoeben J at 78
DECISION: (1) Verdict be entered in favour of the appellant. ; (2) The respondent to pay the appellant's costs at trial and on appeal.
CATCHWORDS: LIABILITY - Employee of sub-contractor, a gyprock fixer, injured his back on building worksite where both contractor and sub-contractor were engaged in constructing gyprock partitions and ceilings – whether contractor so involved in injured respondent employee's work, either directly or through his actual employer's supervisor, as to be subject to a non-delegable duty of care to that employee - and whether that duty breached in the circumstances – whether TNT Australia Pty Limited v Christie & Ors [2003] NSWCA 47 distinguishable. - BREACH – challenge to factual findings upon which liability based – whether employee supplied with suitable equipment – whether causation made out. - DAMAGES – whether s151Z(2) Workers Compensation Act 1987 applied to reduce damages – whether, according to statutory formula, damages should be reduced by contribution contractor entitled to obtain from sub-contractor, if both found liable.
LEGISLATION CITED: Workers Compensation Act 1987 s151Z(2)
Adelaide Stevedoring Co Ltd v Forst (1940) 64 CLR 538 Bennett v Minister of Community Welfare [1992] 176 CLR 408 Chappel v Hart (1998) 195 CLR 232 Purkess v Crittenden (1965) 114 CLR 164 CASES CITED: Samsung Electronics Australia Pty Ltd v Macura [2005] NSWCA 386 Stevens v Brodribb Sawmilling Co Pty Ltd (1986) 160 CLR 16 TNT Australia Pty Limited v Christie & Ors [2003] NSWCA 47 Watts v Rake (1960) 108 CLR 158
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate